Work-Based Learning Experience and Good Practices
Malaysian students get real-life work experiences
through work-based learning programs (WBL). Thereafter, the learners apply
their technical and academic skills in developing their employability. In
essence, WBL is a combination of educational courses that integrate the
workplace with institutional curriculum for an edifying paradigm.
Through good practice, WBL merges practice with
theoretical knowledge while acknowledging tacit and explicit informational
intersection (Raelin, 2012). Most work-based
learning programs in Malaysia consist of commonly accredited higher educational
courses based on win-win strategies. The employers get talented and skilled
workers whereas the students meet their educational needs. In addition, the
learners become aware of their careers, hence can succinctly explore the
potential opportunities through planning and competency attainment.
In the modern times, the young population can clarify
and sharpen their career plans through work experience. In fact, good career
educational programs in Malaysia and other developing Asian nations incorporate
learning from work and systematic experience via the application of techniques
such as work visits, work shadowing, execution of real tasks, and research
projects. The program is beneficial (particularly for career decision-making)
since the participants reflect on their progress and share their experience
with peers.
WBL is beneficial to corporate
employees and trainers because learning-rich occupation boosts their career development chances. For
instance, such individuals are more likely to view their work positively and to
be motivated as learners. Besides, a lack of educational improvement at
workplaces raises the chances of poor performance and downward career drift. In
their study, Anderson et al. (2011) established a link between employee’s
tendencies to participate in vocational training and working in an environment
with voluntary learning opportunities. The possession of skills to understand
how to learn in the workplace is
imperative in positive stimulation of individuals with regards to career
development.
The Malaysian youths enjoy widespread opportunities to
combine work experience and learning for a successful transition. It is
possible to merge formal study and work in ways such as apprenticeships.
Alternatively, the students can do part-time jobs while learning in the
evenings or during weekends. Notably, a combination of work and study bears a
significant impact on the transitional outcomes. The factors that prompt this
observation include apprenticeship occupational skills and the resultant labor
market qualifications. Other aspects include the basic skills and habits
developed when working part-time, signal traits during a job application, and the connection between student employees with
hiring firms.
Literature of WBL mainly focuses on cases in the
developed world. Given the rapid expansion of Malaysian economy, there are
emerging models promising to connect formal vocational education and
apprenticeship training. However, questions arise on the necessity of high
skill economy and advancing social development the work based training systems
(Ball & Cohen, 2012). As a middle-income
economy, Malaysia has a strong formal work-based learning system but the
authorities are yet to develop well-organized WBL arrangements in low-skilled
industries and occupations.
Strategies
Learning institutions should work hand-in-hand with
corporate leaders to adopt institutional and organizational strategies for an
attractive WBL program. In this way, the time spent in a working environment is
resourceful to the student. As a first step, apprenticeship trainers should set
appropriate wages to avoid discouraging applicants. Inflated wages cheer human
resource managers to recruit unskilled labor while failing to train them
accordingly.
Further, organizations ought to observe regulatory and
legal frameworks for apprenticeship arrangements. For example, the employers
and apprentices should sign contracts with a clear
outline of terms and conditions of the agreement. In remote Malaysian regions,
the absence of these provisions prevents scale-up of regional programs for
national adoption. Moreover, it is advisable that the organization should
allocate adequate financial resources for the program, make arrangements for apprentice
certification and qualification, and establish proper governance systems at the
institutional level. Most importantly, the trade unions, organizations, and government have to cooperate
in setting up learning outcomes as per the training qualifications and
standards.
Options
It is important to note that not all work-based
learning experience is educative. Not all job education imparts skills and
knowledge to the participants. Therefore, the Malaysian government is supposed
to determine practical techniques to translate experiences into learning.
University programs that entail WBL in most Asian universities indicate
significant variations with regards to real student learning. Understandably,
the nature and quality of targeted training those organizations provide
influence this observable disparity.
Business strategists and course instructors can
increase the richness of learning in a work environment. First, business
mentors should encourage people to reflect on their experiences and learn from
their mistakes. Second, senior workers and experts in the field should guide
learners and act as role models. Third, practice and demonstrations should be
included as learning strategies. Besides, the supervisors must regularly
provide problems for the workers to solve through avenues like task variety and
rotation. Nearly all of these plans can be integrated with the normal job’s
cycle. Many researchers are interested in the role of employee supervisors and
how they understand the importance of improving the worker’s skills,
experience, and knowledge. In regions where this does not form part of
corporate culture, it is difficult to develop and implement work-based learning
(Andersen et al., 2011). Yet, organizations require a more structured
intervention to develop learning islands, quality circles, and other techniques
for developing learning-rich work environments.
Malaysian enterprises can initiate various methods to
boost and promote work-based learning quality. However, it is specifically
harder for SMEs (small and medium enterprises) that form a larger share of the country’s
firms. In this case, such enterprises should seek assistance from multinational
Coca-Cola and other multinationals. In fact, most external organizations
readily provide training and coaching for in-firm supervisors as part of their
CSR. The federal authorities should pool funds and establish local training
offices. Alternatively, small and medium corporations should receive subsidies
for effective execution of WBL programs. If the working conditions in Malaysia
are appropriate, college teachers (especially those responsible for supervision
and student visits) will assume most of these roles comfortably.
Of keen to note is that work based learning
opportunities depend on daily task schedules and monthly or annual production
cycles. Nevertheless, business leaders can forge inter-organizational
agreements for broad base learning, especially if the services and enterprise
products limit skill and knowledge development in a formal training setting. Just
like in the rest of the developing world, the Malaysian informal sector has an unregulated apprenticeship program. It is
characterized by work-based learning, non-mandatory off-the-job training. In
addition, organizations hardly award formal qualifications in recognition of
competence.
Work-based learning
experiences and career preparation are essential in the formation of
aspirations and informed decision making. The educators can provide such
fundamental experiences during college days or through additional programs that
call for corporate collaborations. The young working class population in
Malaysia needs information on available career options like career assessments
for identification of post-school interests and preferences. Secondly, they
require early exposure on lifetime learning prospects and post-high-school
education. Thirdly, the learners should be career opportunities to earn a
living while acquiring information on asset accumulation, educational
requirements, and benefits potential. Lastly, the trainers should design the
program to improve job acquisition and ethical skills.
Good
Practices and Experience
The development of high-quality
programs for WBL demands relevant and integrated curriculum. Therefore, the
learning institutions must develop curricula
that not only incorporates the subject
matter but also spans to WBL experiences. De Graaf & Kolmos (2013) argue
that pairing students without mentors or enrolling them in internship programs
is not enough. For the learning programs to be successful, the instructors must
set goals for both the employers and students. Furthermore, they should provide
exhaustive instructions for industrial authorities and academicians.
Work-based programs
help students to explore their careers and to be active learners. Consequently,
the educational department should integrate career related activities into all
the curriculum aspects. Career awareness is unattainable unless teachers
introduce students to varied careers and their requirements. Resultantly, the
students explore and refine particular areas of interest. During preparation,
they get a chance to deeply engage in experiences that relate to their career
choices. Often, such opportunities in Malaysia are preceded by several
internships.
Assessments ought to be
authentic since they hold the learners and their trainers accountable for on
and off school education. In essence, the
WBL programs should utilize performance assessments for the apprentices to show
their understanding and newly gained experience. If the teachers conduct the
assessments periodically, it will be possible to shift attention to struggling
students. The implementation process prompts learning institutions to set
explicit goals endorsed by business partners, teachers,
and students.
Additionally, the
teachers must conduct joint planning time. Savery (2015) concedes that in this
way, the educators will facilitate integrated curriculum development plans and
the utilization of assessment tools. They will also develop professionally as
they prepare to set up aligned curriculum or to tour the corporate world. On
the other hand, the scheduling should be flexible. Most activities linkable to
WBL programs in Malaysia hardly fit into the conventional school day. It is,
therefore, a good practice to ensure accommodation of real-world learning
through trade programs, block scheduling, and the provision of opportunities
for college’s simultaneous enrollment.
In 21st
Century economies like Malaysia, WBL is a valuable educational strategy to
prepare learners for career and academic success. Hence, policy makers can support
it through advocacy for implementation at regional level. For example, the
political leaders can introduce legislations in support of funding for WBL
initiatives in rural areas. Moreover, it is important for school authorities to
develop formal partnerships with corporations for students to be absorbed in as
learners. Indeed, work-based educational programs allow students to transition
successfully as youthful learners to responsible workers. If there is a minimal
stakeholder support, the learners can hardly be career-ready.
The
Value
Most multinationals with regional offices in Malaysia
value WBL because the apprentices acquire core competencies that the
organization requires. The program’s worth is recognized in professions such as
education, health, information technology, and other professions that require
completion of an attachment for a student to graduate. Particularly, youth with
disabilities reaps bigger benefits from
the program. Their work experience during secondary schools improves their
prospects for future job security and better income.
Why
Employers engage in WBL
At the national
level, Malaysian work-based learning policies are diversified across different
learning and work environment. It is true, nonetheless, that some regions
(especially urban areas and industrial towns) have a long tradition of engaging
students. It is an emerging trend that fast growing cities in the country and
Asian continent are adopting this policy for the mutual benefit of students and business entities. Remarkably,
employers reap numerous benefits when they develop and implement this policy. To
illustrate, they observe improved performance and productivity. In addition,
the tailored learning addresses the endemic skills gap in the country through
the positive effects of retaining recruits. Further, the management registers
affirmative effects on employee development.
Often, work-based learning improves innovation and
productivity within the participating organizations. Despite that WBL programs
entail initial corporate investment, the returns outweigh such expenditures.
During the final phase, the recruits have acquired necessary business skills
and are productive, hence allowing the human resource department to recoup
initial investments. Notwithstanding, different occupations have distinct
learning scopes. For example, technical jobs such as engineering require a
trainee to participate in a rigorous program before he can engage in productive
work. Contrastingly retail assistants learn while working. Advisably, education
should be a continuous process throughout the production. Additionally,
assessments and supervision are crucial in determining whether learning takes
place or not.
The organization that hosts trainees will potentially
promote them to managerial roles in the future. However, the learners are not
the only group that benefits from the program. Mentors gain useful skills and
knowledge by consistently training new recruits because the young people are
creative and inject fresh thoughts and ideas to the business system. Eventually,
the firm will be rejuvenated as the staff enhance their know-how and solve rising challenges.
Given that the successful trainees are more likely to
stay after program termination, labor turnover reduces significantly due to
apprenticeship project. This is specifically the case for Malaysian
corporations where important aspects (like employee retention, work structure,
and wage platform) interact for a better outcome. The top level management can
improve the connection between the employees and their supervisors through the
development of corporate ethos and values.
According to Raelin (2013), one of the most
fundamental practices, especially for the employer, is to address the skills
gap. Undeniably, work-based learning is an important tool for small and medium enterprises
with limited operational resources. It reacts in an efficient, resourceful, and
flexible manner to meet the company’s demand through development and
implementation of tailored programs for addressing unique skill gaps.
In summary, WBL is a powerful pedagogical form that
can be utilized to determine basic work habits, specific job competencies, and
occupational identity. Not only can it motivate failing and disengaged learners
but also can aid in the development of generic skills like problem-solving, creativity, and innovation. It
significantly boosts the labor market results, especially if the business
organizations consider good practices to enhance the learner’s experience. In
Malaysia, the local governments need to set up institutions to support
extensive high-quality WBL systems for better coordination between learning
institutions and corporations. In this way, the country will move closer to
addressing the persistent challenges in the labor market that arise due to the
mismatch of occupational requirements and student’s skills.
References
Andresen, L., Boud, D., & Cohen, R. (2011).
Experience-Based Learning. Understanding Adult Education and Training, 2, 225-239.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999).
Developing Practice, Developing Practitioners: Toward a Practice-Based Theory of
Professional Education. Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of
Policy and Practice, 1,
3-22.
De Graaf, E., & Kolmos, A. (2013). Characteristics
of Problem-Based Learning. International
Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5),
657-662.
Raelin, J. A. (2012). A Model of Work-Based
Learning. Organization Science,
8(6), 563-578.
Raelin, J. A. (2013). Work-Based Learning: Bridging Knowledge
and Action in the Workplace. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Savery, J. R. (2015). Overview of Problem-Based
Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. Essential
Readings in Problem-Based Learning: Exploring and Extending the Legacy of
Howard S. Barrows, 5-15.
No comments:
Post a Comment