Rebel

Question 1: Rebel

According to L and B-data tests, most people have rebel personality traits. At times, rebellious people break the established rules, even though the outcome can be disadvantageous and painful. However, s-data personality test reveals that such individuals are driven by the need to assert control and power over others. In fact, a defiant being does not reject rules to look different but because they have particular goals and can articulate them with conviction.

Just like in children, scolding and punishment hardly reduce rebelliousness among adults.  Instead, the intervention will intensify their defiant behavior. There are several B-data and L-data elements predicted by an S-data personality test. For example, a rebellious person prefers independence since he would rather give orders than bowing to authority. In addition, they dislike being restrained and being forced to embrace a status quo without question. Therefore, they cannot participate in teamwork activities, especially with submissive individuals. On a positive note, rebels are passionate, intelligent and determined to attain their goals. They are adventurous and show a great potential of leading others through uncertain times. Most importantly, they are courageous and enthusiastic in the face of overwhelming situations.

Question 2: Career Counselor’s Advice

John Holland’s SDS links personality with career choices. Notably, there are sharp differences in male and female personalities captured in the self-development study since men and women express themselves, their values, and interests through experiences and work choices. The assessment technique assumes the accuracy of impressions. Therefore, a man that with a high score on the I and R scales is flexible. He will easily relate to the occupational environment, thus will be comfortable as a business leader or entrepreneur. In addition, the counselor will notify him about his ability to tolerate adverse conditions at the work environment before switching to other professions should he chose. On the other hand, female test subjects are more likely to open up, given that SDS’s I scale is self-scoring and self-administered. The high score for a female on the I scale indicates a ‘people’s person’ mindset. Therefore, she should refrain from work environments that require intrinsic personalities, for instance, Tech sector. in this way, she will explore hidden talent and learn more about her vocational personality. However, it is advisable to try out different jobs in various industries to determine areas of interest and to improve interpersonal skills. The move will not be hard for women scoring high on S scales.

Question 3: Constructivism

According to the constructivist perspective, there is no accurate objective personality judgment measure. In essence, counselors judge clients differently depending on the unique perspectives and observable traits. Therefore, constructivists argue that all judgments are equally correct. Armed with this knowledge, the focus should shift towards perspectives and methods through which individuals make the judgments rather than their accuracy. In psychotherapy, the therapist asks questions to confront the client’s worldview. In this light, he expands his scope for decision making. One of the main assumptions of constructivism assumptions is that the client suffers from a mental problem not because of a disease but due to his inability to frame their life challenges accurately. According to Saakvitne et al. (2012), constructivism is grounded on the assertion that the human mind continuously provides meaning to the world and human experiences for reality development.

The disadvantage of constructivism is that it does not utilize classification techniques like other personality theories. Thus, it is non-beneficial to an individual seeking additional counseling on split personality. It is true that Constructivism offers the researcher a chance to observe the world through the study subject’s eyes. Conversely, it is impossible when working with an inexperienced participant with personality issues.

References

Saakvitne, K. W., Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (2012). Exploring Thriving in the Context of Clinical Trauma Theory: Constructivist Self Development Theory. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 279-299.