The
author introduces the article by talking about two poems by Eddie Guest
and Elliot . The two poets perceive
that human cultural traditions are often taken for granted. He examines the
existing relationship between socio-historic contexts of aesthetic and normal
experience.
As society shrinks to a global community,
writers and artists find it difficult to communicate or justify their stance to
the audience. Today, people question authority, style and tradition, thus
making it harder for writers to predict the audience's response. The author
backs his arguments with examples from Roman Empire
including Beaux-arts, painting and Roman
sculpture (Greenberg 6). He further claims that ancient historic figures like Braque , Brancusi and Klee were inspired by the workplace medium. It implies that
abstracts cannot be accidental or arbitrary unless there is an aesthetic
validity of the subject matter. If art and literature were to be regarded as
imitations of reality as Aristotle thought, every other discipline will fall
short of originality.
The
writer observes that modern poetry is abstract and pure if it is compared to
classical poetry. However, he fails to provide a strong proof that the culture
of the avant-garde is subject to imitation. Avant-Garde is still a necessity in
the modern times because it is a pillar of literature and art.
On
the other hand, Kitsch is an apparition conceived in the West and entails the
art of chronotypes, illustrations, and advertisement. This cultural phenomenon
is mostly taken for granted because it results from European industrial
revolution. It was even made worse by the introduction of writing and reading
to the public and peasants. Still, Kitsch garner more profit when contrasted to
avant-garde. Therefore, Kitsch pressurizes
ambitious artists and writers to alter their work to meet its requirements.
Unlike avant-garde, Kitsch is not restricted to large cities. Instead, it has
spread far and wide hence eliminating and replacing the folk cultures that are dominant.
Advertising
through Artworks
Commercials
and advertisement agencies utilize artwork to capture the targeted customers’
attention. Varnedoe et al state that as early as 19th century,
corporations embraced use or art in advertisements. However, the concept did not gain traction
until the early 1940s in America
when Rockwell
Norman and other artists created
an Orange Crush artistic advert. The author argues that artistic forms such as
abstract expressionism are fashionable hence an enduring form of ‘low’ and
‘high’ advert art.
Fusing
business and art results in profitability for both the artists and the corporations
involved. Art captures emotional
reactions of the audience. Thus, it is a perfect force to convince a market
segment to purchase a product that is new in the market. Art
is a force able to captivate the public attention, besides disseminating
detailed information on the advertised products. Business entities that embrace
artistic advertisement and commercials mostly experience positive outcome and a
return on investment.
The
use of art in commercials and advertisement reached its peak during the mid 20th
century (Kirk, Varnedoe and Adam 342). The American economy was booming at the
time. The motor-vehicle industry was at its best in terms of innovation and
mass production. Therefore, the marketers of many car manufacturing
organizations acquired the skills of the best artists to create adverts and
commercials. There was a stiff competition and rivalry between firms in terms
of accessing a wider market segment, thus, competition in advertising was
rampant. Creativity played a pivotal role in wooing buyers. As such, large
corporations like Coca Cola poured a sizeable amount of resources towards
‘high' and ‘low' advertisements.
References
Greenberg, Clement. Avantgarde und Kitsch. na,
1939: 3-21.Print.
Kirk, Varnedoe, and Adam Gopnik .
"High and low: Modern art and popular culture." New York :
Museum of Modern Art (1990): 311-388.Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment