Addictive
Behavior
Medical
Professionals and patients regard addiction as a disease. One of the reasons
for this view is the direct relation between genetic predisposition and
addition. Another reason is the common phenomenon of victim’s failure to cope
with life stress. Preoccupation, relapse, and compulsion are the three core
components of addictive behavior. Therefore, addiction progressive complex
behavioral pattern composed of psychological, sociological, and biological factors.
Viewing
Addictive behavior as a disease is advantageous to the physicians because they
can source for measures to manage, control, and provide solutions to those that
seek treatment. Today, patients suffering from addictive issues receive aid
through pharmacotherapy. The disadvantage to this mindset is that the
management of the medical facilities can be focused on the accumulation of
financial resources by monetizing treatment. Thus, the physicians label
addiction as ‘disease’ for financial gains. Private treatment facilities
mushroom to tap into the lucrative business of serving drug and substance
addicts. This results in the loss of focus as the concerned parties expand the
pool of patients for consultancy, admission, and insurance (Maddux &
Winstead, 2012).
There
is an implication that the conditions of the patient can be altered for the
better especially if addiction is viewed as an acquired habit with roots in
genetic, behavioral, or pharmacological factors. It is possible to employ
psychological therapy and peer support groups in the treatment of patients that
depend on substance abuse. The limitation is that the doctors ought to gain a
deeper understanding if the patient’s culture and the location of his birth and
upbringing. A successful treatment is mostly attainable if the physicians
understand the social stance and beliefs of the victim. To develop an
intervention program, there is a need to consider the standards that are
socially acceptable with regards to drugs and substance use. Different people
in different societies have varied definitions of addiction and addictive
behavior. In fact, a number of diagnostic tests used as instruments for
diagnosing addicts are derived from age-old beliefs that are commonly held. As
such, testing patients without a prior understanding of the diversity of their
background and beliefs can yield a negative impact. The distinction between a
successful and unsuccessful treatment plan rests in a personal relapse or the
adoption of new behaviors to tame addictive behavior.
Cultural
factors and religious stance are also linkable to addictive behavior, similar
to learned behaviors. If it is a custom for a given religious group participate
in consumption of a particular drug or substance, the exact definition of
addiction and substance abuse would differ from that group of believers to the
other.
From
the immoral or moral viewpoint, addictive behavior entails an engagement that
offers a choice for an individual to
participate freely in particular activities thus making them the masters of
their behavior and destiny. It is advantageous to have values and morals and to
view addition as a sinful act because it keeps some individuals (especially
young people) wary and alert. As such, they refrain from participating in
‘self-destructive' behaviors. All the people at the social policy level are
affected by the aforementioned views. It calls for an enactment of laws and
policies to curb the amount and content of substance that users consume at any
given time. In the long-run, individuals emanating from a melting point of
culture will conceive a ‘societal norm’ (Walther et al., 2012). Under this
view, addicts that refrain from seeking treatment can be jailed for a given
period of time or imposed a hefty fine.
References
Maddux, J.E. &Winstead, B.A. (2012). Psychopathology: Foundations for a
Contemporary Understanding (3rd ed .)
Routledge. Print.
Walther, B.,
Morgenstern, M., & Hanewinkel, R. (2012). Co-occurrence of addictive
behaviors: personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer
gaming. European addiction
research, 18(4),
167-174. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment