Royal
Proclamation and Covenant of Reconciliation
Aboriginals
have endured years of suffering and isolation introduced since the first
European set foot on Canadian soil. The coexistence of Aboriginals prior to
colonization was harmonious. They had properly functional rules and
regulations. In addition, the Aboriginals had effective traditional systems of
governance that ensured their prosperity for thousands of years. It is
interesting to note that Europeans scrapped the aboriginal traditions. Today,
Canadian constitution is a clear demonstration of cultural genocide. In fact, a
lack of inclusivism of Aboriginals in the modern system of governance has
triggered dissatisfaction among the marginalized parties. Over the years,
concerns have mounted for the need to review the constitution and the relations
between the Aboriginals and non-Aboriginal Canadians.
While
the planet is rapidly advancing towards ensuring equality and settlement of
colonial injustices, Canada TRC
recommendation, especially those touching on royal proclamation and covenant of
reconciliation is implemented.
Aboriginals
form a significant part of the national population. It implies that Aboriginals
have a significant role to play to ensure prosperity and to uphold a Canadian culture
of Pride in nationhood. Aboriginals are rich in cultural values that encourage
morality and ethical practices. Discarding such traditions hurts the future
generations besides threatening the Canadian core pillars. Indigenous tribesmen
are fully aware of their identity. It is the reason why they have demonstrated
resiliency in the face of adversity and also during the dark colonial era. Most
ancestors of modern Aboriginals lost lives trying to defend their hereditary
values. As colonial government denied the natives their rights to land and
freedom of movement, the Aboriginals displayed a sense of unity among
themselves. Their tightly-knit political structure is still evident today;
though the western civilization is quickly eroding the traditions (Henderson
& Wakeham, 2009).
Articulation
of the TRC Recommendation
The
UN’s resolution on the rights of aboriginal people has been passed. However, Canada , United
States , Australia United States Canada
Currently,
there is a poor relationship between the leaders of aboriginal communities and
the government authorities. The poor relations are propelled by
misunderstanding and clash of agendas and priorities between the two parties.
In addition, the government shrugs off the needs of native communities hence
slowing the efforts of reconciliation. Not all is lost, however, as the
Canadian government has a chance of renewing treaties. Recognition of
traditions and a show of respect to Aboriginals will be reciprocated through
submission to government authority. The move will diffuse tensions that exist
between the two parties. Moreover, there is a mutual benefit if the relations
are maintained in the long run. For instance in South Africa South Africa
The
benefits derived from reconciliation cannot be understated. Undermining the
minority groups limits establishment of partnership for nation-building. If the
traditional laws are recognized and integrated as part of the country’s
constitution, absorption of native groups to the government is achievable. Land
grabbing is rampant in Canada
Reasons
for inclusion of Recommendation
For
many years, the existing reconciliation measures have been considered as a
legitimization of colonization because they fail to capture the core needs of
Aboriginals in the modern times.
Normalizing or ignoring colonial injustices forms a basis of uproar,
dissatisfaction, and protests by liberals and activist groups. The introduction
of the recommendation by TRC
provides a closure to such injustices and ushers in a new life of inclusivism
in national issues. While the TRC
is partly a state agency, the calls for its establishment were prompted by
rising tensions and communal hostilities. It is hard to avert criticism,
especially from the conservative groups because of a resistance for change and
formation of an all-inclusive government. However, any prosperous government
must be prepared to face its fears and to address the needs of all citizens to
ensure harmony and unity. Ironically, the founding values of TRC do not highlight the role of non-Aboriginal
groups in Canada
The
recommendation is included in TRC ’s
outcomes to ensure a pursuit of a national discourse. Indeed, reconciliation
should be pursuable nationally for it to bear fruits. An invitation of Canadian
government’s policy makers in sourcing for a solution is a strategic step of
introducing the proposal to a wider national audience. If successful,
subsequent ratification or amendments to Niagara
Treaty and 1763 Royal Proclamation will
be implemented. The symbolic ratification will wield a greater influence on the
government intention. It will result in an alteration of mindset and general views
towards Aboriginals. Resultantly, the
natives will be motivated to participate in building the nation through
integrative economic activities. Most importantly, peace will prevail among
Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals.
Validity of the
Recommendation
Ruins
of racism and inequality are hard to avert in a modern multicultural society
like Canada , US or Australia
Reconciliation
and renewed national spirit are fundamental in ensuring national rejuvenation
and settling of scores (Bombay et al., 2013). Postponing reconciliation for
future generations worsen the prospects besides heightening the levels of anger
and discontent among the vulnerable and marginalized societies. It is a ticking bomb whose explosion will
unleash unimagined chaos and confusion within the government. States fail
because of issues such as racial segregation and isolation of minorities. These
issues are often overshadowed by a turn of events hence a cultivation of
hostility among the warring communities. To neutralize foreseeable instability,
it is important to reconcile the contrasting groups through sourcing of a
middle ground for a win-win solution. Involving aboriginals in the drafting of
constitutional amendments is a critical foundational step.
The
Adoption Process
Firstly,
the government should call hold a meeting with aboriginal leaders to chat the
way forward. It is important to involve the local natives to get an idea on how
crown policies affect their day-to-day lives. Secondly, an oversight committee
should be formed to work on outlining the pertinent issues hindering
reconciliation between the worrying parties (Wakeham, 2012). The committee
should be mandated with a task of sourcing for information regarding
outstanding matters to be included in the amendment. The select committee should also uphold the
rights of Aboriginals to ensure swift transition. In the past, efforts to
reconcile the natives with whites and other non-Aboriginal societies have
failed because of a resistance on the policies upholding colonial rule while
suppressing the traditions and culture. A repetition of such failures should be
avoided through addressing key issues.
Ratification
of contentious laws inscribed in terra
nullius and Doctrine of Discovery
should precede the adoption of UN resolutions on rights of indigenous people.
In fact, the UN declarations should replace the rigid and contentious Victorian
laws because they fulfill modern needs of the Aboriginal population.
Educating
the public on the ratified laws is imperative. It creates awareness on the
renewed effort to encourage reconciliation. The government should set aside
funds to be used in the massive undertaking for optimal results. Besides,
recreational activities should be organized. The activities should include
cultural festivals and an establishment of museums for display of traditional
attire and Aboriginal vintages. The facilities should be placed under native
care. This way, the marginalized groups will have a sense of belonging in spite
of an embrace of modern culture. Recreational activities help build a strong
relationship hence setting a reconciliatory mode.
Experts
of aboriginal descent should be involved in the documentation of legal
traditions and indigenous laws. Aboriginal elders consulted widely to affirm
the accuracy of the documented information (Lambrecht, 2013). Thereafter, a
specialized body should handpick the necessary traditional laws for inclusion
in the overall document for adoption. Subsequently, law enforcers should be
briefed adequately on the new regulations to be implemented. In case of minor
adjustments, legislative arms should be authorized to hasten the process. The integration process should take a maximum
of five years.
An
analysis of TRC recommendations
reveals that the commissioners had an adequate time to gather data regarding
the injustices perpetrated by the Canadian government towards the aboriginal
population. For more than a century, Canada North America
for thousands of years. Their success and survival in such a harsh environment
was accelerated by their culture of environmental care and valuing of human dignity
(Wyatt et al., 2010). Contrastingly, Western Culture is a few hundred years
old. Its maturity levels are not comparable to that of aboriginals. In fact,
Aboriginal culture has stood the test of time. It is ironic that a younger
culture is used to wage war and to abolish a resilient tradition.
In
light of concern for the extinction of esteemed moral values, a time has come
for the Canadian government to face the fact and to address the constant threat
to its own existence (Coulthard, 2014). Notably, a deterioration of Canada US , UK
and Canada Southwest
Asia . As such, Canada
Injustices
are hereditary. Bitterness and rivalry
are passed from one generation to the other. A clear example is a turmoil in
the Middle East . The cause of war in Iraq and Syria Canada
World
Wars led to deposition of Kings and Imperial rule. Less than a century ago,
most parts of Africa were under British
colonial rule. The established protectorates could not survive because the
harsh rule did not resonate well with most native Africans. In the end, there
were calls for liberation and establishment of independent states hence the
abolition of the stringent colonial rule. Although most African nations are
still struggling to stabilize, many scholars are optimistic about the future of
Africa . In fact, Africa 's
economy is growing at an unprecedented rate. There are projections that by 2035
the annual expansion of a majority of African nations will be in double digits.
Conclusion
References
Alcantara, C., & Whitfield, G. (2010).
Aboriginal self-government through constitutional design: A survey of fourteen
Aboriginal constitutions in Canada.Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue
d'études canadiennes, 44(2),
122-145. Retrieved from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jcs/summary/v044/44.2.alcantara.html
Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, White
masks. Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. Minneapolis :
University of Minnesota
DeVerteuil, G., & Wilson ,
K. (2010). Reconciling indigenous need with the urban welfare state? Evidence
of culturally-appropriate services and spaces for Aboriginals in Winnipeg , Canada
Dorrell, M. (2009). From Reconciliation to
Reconciling: Reading What" We Now Recognize" in the Government of Canada 's 2008 Residential Schools Apology.ESC : English Studies in Canada
Egan, B. (2013). Towards shared ownership:
Property, geography, and treaty making in British Columbia Geografiska Annaler
Lambrecht, K. N. Canada University of Regina
Wakeham, P. (2012). Reconciling"
terror": Managing Indigenous resistance in the age of apology. The American Indian Quarterly, 36(1), 1-33. Retrieved from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/aiq/summary/v036/36.1.wakeham.html
No comments:
Post a Comment