The
Myth of Child Prodigy
For
a long time, Child Prodigies are regarded as geniuses assured to lead a
successful life. What people do not realize is that the majority acquire their
above average knowledge and skills at a tender age through constant practice
and discipline. In fact, the family is mostly involved in hyping the prospects
and sustaining the prodigy status of a child. Numerous parents are responsible
for enrolling children in advanced
institutions where a special attention is given to them to nurture their
talents and to keep the dreams alive. However, when child prodigies learn of
their ordinary mental capabilities and talents, many are disappointed, lose
focus, and burn out. Malcolm Gladwell is a Canadian prodigy that was regarded
as a child prodigy. In his Bring the Family
address, he confirms that prodigies spend their childhood practicing and
mimicking successful adults in their areas of specializations, which is
impractical and inapplicable in their later life (Wargo 1).
Gladwell’s loss of a major race at the age of 15
confirmed his worst fears that he was just another ordinary athlete. Despite
hundreds of hours of specialized training to nurture his talent, he still could
not deliver to the societal expectations. As a result, it became clearer to him
that his immediate family and the society have overrated his abilities and
talent. It dawned on Gladwell that he was not one of the best in the country,
but his success depended on the efforts, dedication, and practice invested,
just like his peers. The sportsman’s childhood glory and prowess were not replicated during his adulthood as had
long been expected by speculators. However, his is not an isolated case because
most children regarded as possessing extraordinary
skills and brainpower end up losing their steam after their teenage years. It
is an anomaly that has unsettled psychologists for a long time as it threatens
to annul or redefine the entire concept of prodigy.
The majority of alums of specialized
institutions are not Pulitzer-prize or Nobel Prize winners because the
isolation shuts out the prodigies from an all-round development needed in
understanding and development of a practical
solution to human problems (Ruthsatz 421). In the article, Gladwell is
convinced that child prodigies are gifted in learning and find it hard to transition
to gifted doers as adults. On the other
hand, non-prodigy individuals can adapt smoothly to the adult lifestyle because
of their ease of relating to ordinary
lifestyle and events, thus guaranteeing their success as adult geniuses. The
knowledge is important to psychologists as it enables them to devise strategies
to combat non-attainment of expectations by prodigies in adulthood.
The
article is also important from a psychological standpoint because it opens a
new field of knowledge. Psychologists’ focus should shift towards understanding
the core factors that contribute to the phenomenon exhibited by Malcolm
Gladwell and other child prodigies that fail to sustain their extraordinary status as skilled athletes,
artists, philosophers, or scientists. The knowledge begs the question whether
the prodigy phenomenon is misconstrued or scanty information is available to
aid the gifted young learners. If the later is true, a solution needs to be
sourced promptly (Wargo 1). On the other hand, efforts should be made to
eliminate cases of underestimation of the capabilities average children as
suggested by Malcolm Gladwell.
In
summary, it is clear from the article that child prodigies experience
difficulty in adapting to adult lifestyle, where success is measured by
practicality rather than theoretical know-how.
Many child prodigies are disappointed to understand that they are vulnerable to
failure just as the ordinary children or adults. It is especially so because
prodigy institutions do not shed light on this possibility hence rendering the
students vulnerable to burnout.
Works
Cited
Ruthsatz, Joanne, and Jourdan B. Urbach.
"Child Prodigy: A Novel Cognitive Profile Places Elevated General
Intelligence, Exceptional Working Memory and Attention to Detail at the Root Of
Prodigiousness." Intelligence 40.5 (2012): 419-426.
Wargo, Eric. "The Myth of Prodigy and Why
It Matters." APS Observer 19 (2006): 1. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment