The
Impact of Costing and Funding Regimes in the UK NHS
Background
In
the United Kingdom, the knowledge of care providers at NHS is improving
continually, especially regarding how to spend the income and the impact of
such spending on service provision and
the patients. Still, the process of costing is considerably variable according
to the care provider. Inconsistency is common in the classification of physical and human resources and other activities
conducted within the hospital setting. Particularly, datasets and costing
allocations used for quality management and cost are inconsistent. In addition, it is a common knowledge that
detailed information on patient care cost cannot necessarily be provided by all
provider’s costing systems (Blunt and Bardsley, 2012). Therefore, a research on
the impact of costing and funding regimes in the NHS is necessary to add on the
existing knowledge regarding the transparency of the practices, improvement of
clinical ownership, and to inform on the funding policies implemented in the
NHS system.
I
am motivated to conduct this research because of the inadequacy of the
information on the scrutinized data about the outcomes and cost of care. Many
hospitals in the United Kingdom are introducing computerized information systems
to track and analyze the cost of health care
to the patients. Thus, this calls for a research to assess the effectiveness of
such introductions, given that little information is currently available to the
public.
Statement
of Purpose
The main purpose
of this research is to analyze the history of costing and funding regimes at
NHS. Additionally, it assesses distinct types of costing employed by varied
medical facilities and their importance. Besides, the research should highlight
the usefulness of PLICS (Patient-Level Information
and Costing System) if it is properly integrated and implemented (Blunt and
Bardsley, 2012). Moreover, the study establishes an evidence base for testing
the need for an improved national costing strategy and cost collection
strategy. In fact, the study outcome ought to inform the decision if the
government should mandate both.
Transforming
from one form of costing to the other is not easy. Thus, the research eases the
process by supporting the decision makers in the sector to transform
successfully. It highlights the
significance of undertaking assurance processes, developing national costing
community and costing capability, and development of mechanisms to make the best utilization of cost information while
engaging non-finance healthcare staff in the United Kingdom. My main audience
for the study include patients, healthcare professional, and the government
officials. The targets set for this study are realistic because all the study
respondents and subjects are within reach. As an experienced researcher, I
intend to team up with other professionals in the field for advice and guidance.
The timeframe allocated for this research is 5 months. Therefore, the allocated
timeframe, if properly managed will be enough to gather and analyze field data.
Literature
Review
In
the UK, the costing methods applied provide outputs
at the patient level because the medical facilities put the patient at the
heart of cost management. Considering this, it is possible to combine the
information on the patient with the necessary healthcare quality measures. Blunt
and Bardsley (2012) argue that since the introduction of funding regimes and
costing in the UK’s NHS, the cost of healthcare provision from one patient to
the other can be tracked across the settings, providers, and related outcomes.
In essence, it provides a larger picture of the efficiency and quality of
healthcare, though it is subjected to government regulations. The combination of quality information and cost
guarantees focused efficiency on the basis of quality care.
According
to Adil (2012), NHS recently introduced PLICS
(Patient-Level Information and Costing System) that represents a transformation
in the costing methodology. Initially, the costing
and funding methodology predominantly applied ‘top-down’ allocation approach
according to appointments and averages. Contrastingly, the latest approach is
sophisticated and more direct because it is based on the actual events and
interactions related to the associated
costs and the patients. In this case, cost calculations occur by tracing actual
resources used by a patient and the resultant associated costs. For instance,
if imaging services are provided, each patient that receives them must be
ascertained to allow for the attribution of the associated cost. Eventually, it
will be possible to allocate income to individual patients to allow for the
mapping of their profitability.
Ellwood et al. (2015) observe that PLICS improves resource use and clinical
ownership dramatically. It is easier to initiate dialogues regarding resources
consumed by particular patients for comparisons with teams, peer groups, and
healthcare officials. Further, it provides crucial but necessary information
demonstrating the insufficiency of tariff granularity for improved recognition
of specialist activities. In fact, according to Kallala et al. (2015), the
regulatory bodies can monitor and ascertain the contributions made by business
units.
The
existent costing method reflects accurately how the funding is spent. As
patient receive healthcare services, the management of the medical facility carries out activities to deliver these
services, thus mandating the need to
spend resources on such. Baker and
Gilbert (2013) argue that even though proper costing methods are in use by some
facilities in the UK, simplified versions are of costing strategies are
applicable to the majority of healthcare
service providers. However, it is notable that simplified costing techniques
hardly reflect how the providers are spending financial resources accurately.
Hence, the adoption of the latest technology in costing
results in better and informed decision making.
Costing methods in NHS considers the existing general
ledger of the provider, which is viewed as fundamental to the entire process of cost management. According to Chapman and
Kern (2011), the current costing method
utilizes decision support structures and available information to manage
provider’s operations. The structures include physical resources as defined by
stock and procurement management, human resources that form part of the
existent organization structure, and the activities conducted daily by
operational and service managers. If the cost is directly linked to the care of individual patients, clinicians
can easily recognize the yielded cost information. In this way, it is probable
that the information will be utilized, as
the assessment and improvement of information accuracy are made much easier.
Methods
The following are the objectives of the study.
i.
To assess the level of improvement in
technical efficiency brought by costing and funding regimes in the UK NHS.
ii.
To analyze how the resources are
utilized within healthcare economies in the United Kingdom.
iii.
To establish a link between quality of health care and cost management and resource
use.
iv.
To determine how information system and
clinical ownership results in a greater
clinical engagement.
v.
To show how PLICS, as a new method of costing in the United Kingdom, is better
than the previous methods applied at NHS.
Data Collection Methods
Questionnaire
To meet the objectives of this
study, I intend to use several data collection methods as per the nature of
respondents. My main focus is to distribute questionnaires to study subjects it
is the cheapest method to use in this study (Robinson and McCartan, 2016).
Given the limited timeframe for the study, most of the questions to be availed
will be close-ended and direct. While some of the questionnaires will be handed
out to the respondents, others will be sent via mail and later returned via the
provided address in an envelope. The move will ensure the utmost level of confidentiality to enable the
respondent to disseminate full information. Additionally, this method is adaptable for the entire sampled sectors such
as patients, officials of the medical facility and the management (Singleton et
al., 2013).
Furthermore, questionnaires are
appropriate for the collection of
infrequent or regular routine data on costing and funding regimes in the NHS.
The respondents will fill out the required information themselves, thus
minimizing instances of the provision of
skewed and inappropriate data. It should be noted that the selected respondent
have first-hand information on how the
methods of costing such as PLICS impact
the healthcare environment. In fact, most of them (especially the patients) are
direct beneficiaries of the efficiency of services brought by technological
methods of costing that include Patient-level information and costing system.
Interviews
Besides filling in questionnaires,
interviewing the respondent is crucial because it allows for face to face
interactions with the respondent (Gill et al., 2014). As a data collection
method, it is ideal for extra inquiry to
capture information not gathered by use of close-ended questionnaires. Given
that this is a qualitative research, taking notes while talking with the study
subjects is important. Later, the notes will be interpreted for further
analysis. Specifically, conducting an interview ensures the establishment of a
link between quality of health care, cost
management and resource use in NHS (Robinson and McCartan, 2016). To access the
organizational premises, a request will
be made earlier to the concerned authorities and the respondents. The data
gathered will be analyzed using computer software such as Microsoft excel and
Mysql (Ott and Longnecker, 2015). Lastly, the plausibility of the conclusion
will be checked by comparing the research outcome with other relevant studies
formerly conducted in a similar field.
Ethical
Issues
To conduct the research ethically,
I will focus on protecting the research
subjects by maintaining confidentiality. Under all circumstances, I will not
disclose personal information about the respondents because of the sensitivity
of the information gathered. The majority
of study subjects are staff at distinct healthcare facilities in the UK.
Therefore, any disclosure of their participation may cost them their jobs. In
addition, I am obliged to ensure high quality of research and to refrain from
falsified information to alter purposely alter the research outcome (Behi and
Nohan, 2012). In fact, the ethical principles bind
me to maintain factual data to validate the outcome of the study. Furthermore,
I ought to comply with the legislation and laid down rules of the organization
that I draw the respondents from. It is also important for me to foster a strong relationship with the respondents for
them to provide factual and useful information.
Project Plan
The following is a research project plan to be
conducted within a span of 5 months.
Activity
|
Time
|
Formulating
research topic
|
2
Weeks
|
Research
background
|
2Weeks
|
Review
of literature
|
2
Months
|
Actual
field study
|
1
Month weeks
|
Data
analysis
|
3Weeks
|
Research
conclusion
|
1
Week
|
References
Adil, M., 2012. Use Of Patient Level Costing Data (Doctoral dissertation). Manchester
Business School.
Baker, J. and Gilbert, D., 2013. Clinical Effectiveness
and the Pace of Change. British
Journal of Nursing, 6(15),
pp.845-845.
Behi, R. and Nolan, M., 2012. Ethical Issues In
Research. British Journal of
Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing), 4(12),
pp.712-716.
Blunt, I. and Bardsley, M., 2012. Patient-Level
Costing: Can it Yield Efficiency Savings?. Report,
Nuffield Trust, London.
Blunt, I. and Bardsley, M., 2012. Use of
Patient-Level Costing to Increase Efficiency in NHS Trusts. Nuffield Trust, London.
Chapman, C. and Kern, A., 2011. Designing Cost
Systems in Healthcare. British Journal of
Nursing, 14(1). Pp. 2-54.
Ellwood, S., Chambers, N., Llewellyn, S.,
Begkos, C. and Wood, C., 2015. Debate: Achieving the Benefits of Patient-Level
Costing—Open Book Or Can't Look?. Public
Money & Management, 35(1),
pp.69-70.
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. and
Chadwick, B., 2014. Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research:
Interviews and Focus Groups. British
Dental Journal, 204(6),
pp.291-295.
Kallala, R.F., Vanhegan, I.S., Ibrahim, M.S.,
Sarmah, S. and Haddad, F.S., 2015. Financial Analysis of Revision Knee Surgery
Based on NHS Tariffs and Hospital Costs. Does It Pay to Provide a Revision
Service?. Bone & Joint
Journal, 97(2),
pp.197-201.
Ott, R.L. and Longnecker, M., 2015. An Introduction to Statistical
Methods and Data Analysis. New York: Nelson Education.
Robson, C. and McCartan, K., 2016. Real World Research. London:
Wiley.
Singleton Jr, R.A., Straits, B.C. and Straits,
M.M., 2013. Approaches to
Social Research. London: Oxford University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment