The
two cases selected for analysis in the paper include the case study of Sam and that of Linda Monroe .
Case
of Sam
1.
Ethical Dilemma
2.
Code of Ethics (CoE)
Clearly,
Mr. Adam
breaks several codes of professional ethics evidenced by his relationship with
the special needs student and colleagues as well. For instance, 1.0 Teaching and Assessment code 1.4
requires him to create a safe and effective environment that best suits the
needs for the student: he obviously fails to fulfill this. Additionally Adams openly violates 4.0 Professional Colleagues code 4.3 due to his failure to collaborate effectively
with his fellow colleagues in ensuring proper intellectual development of Sam .
3.
Ethical Deliberation
To
further understand and help Sam , Mr. Adam
should strive to establish a deeper knowledge of Sam
situation by gathering information from parents and friends. Also, Mr. Adams is obliged to widely
consult Mr. Kindle on how he handles Sam ’s situation such that he fairs well in his class.
My rationale for selection of this approach is based on Mr. Kindle
ability to clearly fully understand the needs of the special student.
4.
Addressing the Situation
There
is a possibility that Mr.
Adams violates the CoE without
prior knowledge. The immediate supervisor to the teacher should, with immediate
effect, clearly and firmly outline the violated rules to the teacher. On the
other hand, Mr. Adams should make an effort to further understand
in detail the level of special care that Sam
requires. This way, the student will boost his level of self esteem and
eventually regain the prior learning momentum.
Case
of Linda Monroe
1.
Ethical Dilemma
2.
Code of Ethics
It
is evident that CoE on 6.0 Parents and
Families 6.7 has been skewed by Mr.
Sears , either intentionally or
unintentionally. Such behavior has encouraged Linda
to portray an utterly unacceptable behavior during class session, for instance
showing off her bra to Mr.
Seers in front of her classmates.
Additionally, Mr. Sears
breaks 4.0Proffessional Colleagues 4.1 code
by failing to heed to the advice from Ms. Phelps ,
the new teacher, arrogantly disregarding her wealth of experience and knowledge
in handling special needs students.
3.
Ethical deliberation
4.
Addressing the Situation
The
colleague whom Mr. Sears narrates his story to should remind
him of the possibly violated professional codes, including that which focuses
on the establishment of a professional relationship between the teacher and the
student. Mr. Sears should act on the code requirement
with an immediate effect to avoid further deterioration of his professionalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment