Tuesday, 7 June 2016

Su Shi

Su Shi
Su Dongpo (also widely known as Su Shi) is one of the greatest Chinese poets. He was born in January 1101 in Jiangsu province, Changzhou China. Su Shi was also an accomplished artist, public official, and a calligrapher (Cai 314). The essayist hailed from a prominent literary family. As a young person, he excelled in his official examination, which allowed him to occupy numerous government positions during his distinguished and long career.
Year-on-year, Su’s popularity grew tremendously across the province. He became a well-known important figure across the country due to his industrious services. However, Su sometimes encountered sharp criticisms from the senior figures in the government. For example, in the year 1079, Wang Anashi (a provincial prime minister) banished Su Shi to Hubei, Hangzhou province because Su strongly opposed his measures of radical reforms. Su Shi later wrote about Wang’s leadership under the poem Emperor Shenzong (Murck 31). Still, there is a heated debate whether Wang banished Su Shi because of a fierce rivalry, given that the prime minister was an accomplished poet himself.
While Su Shi served five-year banishment, he maintained strong relations with Wang. In fact, he maintained his friendship with the leader as demonstrated when he shared his poems and literary works with him. Similarly, he was optimistic when he was banished to the Island of Hainan in 1094. Ancient records indicate that Su was never bitter with his rivals. During his sunset years, Su Shi returned to the mainland, where his reputation and dignity was restored.
Literary Forms
Su Shi mastered nearly all the literary forms in China. They included regulated verses such as Shi, prose poetry like Fu, and song forms such as Ci. Other forms included painting, calligraphy, and essays. Particularly, Su laid a strong emphasis on the need for expressiveness and spontaneity in his poems. A critical analysis of his work indicates Su’s significant attempts to loosen conventional poetry especially on content and form with regards to ci. As a result, Chinese scholars consider him as the founder of haofang literature. Most of Su’s poems and literary works vividly describe his experiences and those of fellow residents in the hands of oppressive leadership. Ironically, Su was optimistic and resilient both in his private and political life.
Despite being a great poet of the Song Dynasty, Su Shi was mostly caught on the wrong side of the political divide because he authored seditious political satires. During the reign of Yuafeng, Su was convicted for writing slanderous songs and allegedly satirical poems. Some of the allegations were later proven to be untrue. A persecution of a literary artist such as Su Shi paints a grim picture of the extent of political control and censorship of literature interpretations in the Ancient Chinese civilization. The legal battle that ensued between Su Shi and the state is notoriously known as “Crow Terrace Poetry Case” (Zhang 59). Some of the politically suspect poems authored by Su Shi that almost caused him his life include the following section on twin juniper trees.
“… facing one another in dignity, an unassailable pair,
Their straight trunks rise to the sky without ostentation,
Their roots reach the nether regions, never bend nor twist,
Known to the dragon alone that lies in hibernation…” (Zhang 59)
Notably, a dragon is a symbol of Chinese political power. In the past, Chinese royal leadership identified with the dragon image. Thus, its inclusion in Su’s poem was seen as a disgrace to the emperor, given that the poems authored by prominent persons were subjected to political reading. There were numerous interpretations of this section because it disclosed numerous instances of poetry and its relationship with the empirical authority.
Poems
As a great literature master, Su Shi often shares ranks with Ouyang Xiou. Specifically, his poems such as Literary Giant and Cliff Rhapsody are some of the most widely read pieces beyond China. Additionally, his Ci writing is often compared to that of Xin Qiji, who is reputed as the greatest literary artist of Southern Song Dynasty. Su Shi’s two masterpieces indicate the humanity’s greatness and the importance of the artist’s independence. In essence, the writer advocated for the need for a clear distinction between politics, religion, and scholarly works to ensure freedom of expression.
Today, Cliff Rhapsody is included in numerous anthologies of classical Chinese literature translations. In the beginning of the Cliff Rhapsody, the author suggests an entry into a spiritual realm (the world of immortals). According to him, this was an alternate reality that could intersect with the human world at any moment. His technique in this poem strikingly resembles landscapes dream in the poetry of western prose.  The poem is a dialogue between the author and his friend about the story of a flute player that grieves the shortness of human’s life and longs for eternity. Therefore, Su Shi succeeds in capturing the attention and the emotions of his audience through detailed descriptions of the speaker and characters in the poem.
More than 2, 600 songs and poems authored by Su Shi are survived and are spread in different archives and museums across China. The majority of his poems adhere to Chi principles and styles, including Shui Diao Ge Tou that was inspired by the 200 AD naval clash of three Chinese Kingdoms. He also mentions about the Battle of Chibi that took place between 2o6-208 AD.  However, it is worth noting, however, that Su Shi’s fame rests almost entirely on his Ci poetry style (Yin 25). He vividly describes the natural phenomena both in his visual art and written essays.
Essays
Furthermore, the author artistically documented his travel experiences in a collection of day trip essays. He employed diary, narratives, prose and songs in these documentations to ignite the interests of his audience. He used his day trip essays to convey moral and philosophical arguments, even though they contained information on topography, culture, and geography. For instance in the Documentation of Stone Bell Mountain, Su Shi conduct a deep investigation on the accuracy of the ancient ‘stone bells’ documents. In the end, he offers his judgment on the matter and recommends further investigation in the future.
In summary, Su Shi was one of the most important scholars and political activists in the ancient China. He utilized his literary skills to document the political situation and oppression that existed in the empire, thus leading to his periodic clash with the political leaders. Due to his persistence and staunch stance, Su Shi was occasionally banished from his homeland, though he later returned to the mainland years before his death. Today, his poems and songs have greatly influenced modern literature in Japan, Eastern Asia, and the Western hemisphere.
Questions
1.      In what ways has Su Shi influenced Chinese Literature?
2.      List five authors in the modern China whose work is inspired by Su Shi’s style.

Work Cited
Top of Form
Cai, Zong-qi. How to Read Chinese Poetry: A Guided Anthology. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014: 300-364). Print.
Murck, Alfreda. Poetry and Painting in Song China: The Subtle Art of Dissent. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Asia Center for the Harvard-Yenching Institute, 2011: 1-76. Print.
Yin, Jiang. "The Concept of Qing in Classic Chinese Poetry." Social Sciences in China 1 (2000): 20-27. Print.

Zhang, Longxi. Allegoresis: Reading Canonical Literature East and West. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2005: 300-364. Print.

Psychology Learning and Memory

Psychology Learning and Memory
The brain of a human being is more than just tissue mass encased in the skull’s protective shell. It is a major organ that controls all the actions, senses, perceptions, memory, and thoughts. There are millions of neurons in the brain. They are interconnected to allow for rapid movements of signals to all parts of the body. Besides, neurons are responsible for interpretation of information gathered in the surroundings and translating them into actions or thoughts. Indeed, research indicates that the human brain is the most complex and vital part of the body. Therefore, any malfunction or disorder in a particular part of the brain greatly affects the quality of human life, memory, and learning.
Cutting the connection of optic nerves in the brain can lead to the victim becoming blind. Furthermore, if the part of the human brain responsible for ideas, thoughts and long-term memories is greatly hampered, chances are that the person can suffer from brain disorders such as Asperger’s syndrome, complete memory loss, schizophrenia, loss of identity, or autism. Additionally, any mental illness that can alter the emotions and behavioural patterns of an individual has a tendency to influence the way the victim chose to live and interact with friends, family, and other members of the society.
Schizophrenia is one of the most commonly observed and widely recognized psychological disorders that affect the human nervous system. Often, the illness is considered chronic because it can result in a disability. Schizophrenia patients can hardly distinguish between fiction and facts because their brains process images of subjects that do not exist in real life. As a result, it is hard for the victims to acquire or retain information. Furthermore, the imaginary world and constant hallucinations prevent patients from free expressions of themselves (Boyle, 2014).
The brain is a complex neuron system that stores and exchange information at all time. For a normal person, distinct brain parts perform specific and specialized tasks. However, for patients suffering from mental disorders such as schizophrenia, some of the brain parts that can be affected include limbic system, hindbrain, and forebrain. These three parts are responsible for retaining memory and learning. Specifically, the forebrain regulates cognitive processes such as judgement, hunger, perception, information, sleep, and thinking. Therefore, their normal functions are affected by schizophrenia. Studies indicate that a medical condition on the forebrain can lead to symptoms of visual and auditory hallucinations.
The hindbrain controls motor activity. If schizophrenia affects this part of the brain, the patient is likely to exhibit a confused body movement, minimized reaction to environmental stimuli, and rigid posture. On the other hand, a limbic system is the innermost part of the brain and control memory and thought process, sexual behaviour, and emotions. For patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or Asperger’s syndrome, this part of the brain shows minimized interaction in the social circles among the patients. Besides, if the patients are suffering from the disorder, they will become disorganized, hence making it hard for them to engage in learning and memorization.
Aberrant neurodevelopment in the brain of a human being causes schizophrenia. Doctors, friends, and parents of an individual can notice the mental disorder during early adulthood (Boyle, 2014). Like other mental illnesses, schizophrenia results in derangement of orderly central nervous system development, thus prompting a static period of active operation.
Autism
Autism is a neurological disorder that affects the functioning of the brain during the early years of the child’s development. According to the study conducted by Autism Society of America, the disorder prevents normal brain development, hence affecting the child’s social interaction and communication skills. In a population of 10, 000 people, up to 15 individuals are affected by autism. The majority of the victims are male, though the disease is not limited to a particular ethnic or racial group. Given that autism is related to brain functioning, scientists are yet to discover the real cause. It is hard for educators to devise a particular learning program for children suffering from autism because the deficits and skills vary greatly among the patients. In fact, autistic people show a distinct and individualized combination of needs and strengths.
PDD (persuasive development disorders) has five syndromes that include autism, but all bear similar characteristics. Often, doctors diagnose PDD as early as 15 months after birth, especially when the child is still developing and growing. Therefore, diagnosis may change according to the behavioural changes of the child. Children with PDD and autism share special needs in behaviour, social interaction, and nonverbal or verbal communication. There is a high possibility that the autistic children will be dependent on a type of learning style as they grow up. For instance, a child could be a visual learner if they are mostly interested in watching television, staring at objects or people, or looking at books. On the other hand, an autistic child that like talking people or listening to music is an auditory learner.
Children with ASD (autism spectrum disorder) follow a distinct developmental pattern as compared to normal children. Their brains develop at a different rate, leading to challenges in understanding what the others think or feel. Eventually, autism makes it harder for such children to interact or communicate constructively with their teachers, or other learners. Challenges like these affect how the victims will develop and learn. For example, while an autistic child may start talking 12 months after birth, they can hardly experience language explosion like other typical children. Probably, an autistic child will learn only a handful of words per month while growing up. Another common instance is that autistic children can label their body parts but cannot translate the same to a picture of a human body.
It is not easy for autistic children to tune into the surroundings and people. Autism affects the part of the brain that allows a normal child to respond to their name, smile at caregivers, or make eye contact without necessarily being instructed to. Joint attention refers to the use of gestures and eye contact to share experiences and emotional reactions with others. A child with autism lacks shared or joint attention. For example, while reading with the mother, it is normal for a child to point to an object in the book and look back to the parents to show her. For an autistic child, this is an uphill task because the part of the brain responsible for such an action is dysfunctional. However, they can utilize eye contact and gestures to instruct another person do what they want.
Psychologists argue that joint attention is a fundamental skill required when developing language and communication skills. If it lacks, the child will have a hard time grasping information in class, thus affecting the learning process. Additionally, children that show difficulty with joint attention may not learn important skills such as keeping the conversation topic or interpreting facial expressions. According to the theory of mind, autistic individuals are unaware that people have different beliefs and desires. Because of this, they cannot predict the behaviour of their colleagues or understand how their actions influence the behaviour of their friends.
Furthermore, autistic persons struggle with paying attention, maintaining focus on learning tasks, managing time, memorizing activities, and controlling emotions (Willey, 2014). Abilities such as these enable typical humans to execute their daily chores and to work cooperatively with others, and to prioritize their engagements. In particular, it is difficult for children that lack these abilities to learn because their brain cannot organize their ideas or synchronize all the information to solve a problem. Like other mental illnesses, autism prevents a patient from seeing the bigger picture. Instead, they get lost in the details of a particular object rather than gathering together all the information sources to observe the situation as a whole. It is true that the ability to focus on details can be strength especially for an adult, but for an autistic child, his ability to learn and develop is greatly affected.
Educating People with Mental Illness
People suffering from schizophrenia, autism, and other mental illnesses demand special attention from parents, friends, and caregivers. It is important for the parents to fully support individuals with mental disorders to enable them to control symptoms for their conditions. If the person is diagnosed as an adult, he should be encouraged to seek medical attention to arrest the condition.  Services of a therapist are also critical in supporting the autistic patient through the learning process. Besides, the teacher should make a concerted effort to understand the particular needs of a learner with a mental disorder. Special attention should be provided to guarantee their progress through different phases of learning. However, stigmatization of a victim in a learning environment should be discouraged by highlighting the misconceptions on mental illnesses.
Remedial instructions should be installed to improve the ability and skills of each student. Most importantly, the teachers should utilize various techniques such as extensive explanation, additional practice, repetition of information, and devotion of additional time to guide each student as per their areas of needs. Autistic students need to be taught on basic competency and life skills. Therefore, the educators should consider modification of the educational curriculum to accommodate and prove the needs of each learner. The parent or a guardian should enrol a child to an institution for special education to assist the child in progressing rapidly in their learning. In the developed countries, most special education programs have specified instructions for particular learning difficulties like language and speech impairments, visual and hearing impairments, emotional disturbance, or autism. During admission, the learners are tested and listed in individual categories. Then, they are paired with specialized teachers specifically prepared to teach a given group.
Moreover, a student that requires a special attention should be admitted to a special school to tap into multiple techniques that promote learning. Depending on the disorder, teaching methods in such institutions entail problem-solving assignment, group work, and individualized instructions. Besides, special accommodations are provided when students need to take tests. For example, for autistic learners, oral sessions can be arranged, while for slow learners, the examination time can be lengthened.
In summary, different mental illnesses affect several parts of a human brain. Some of the symptoms of schizophrenia include hallucination and reduced psychomotor activity. On the other hand, autistic learners can hardly retain memory or concentrate on a given task. Considering this, it is important for friends, family and guardians to support such individuals by enrolling them to special learning institutions to meet their needs. Emotional support is also important and necessary.





References
Boyle, M. (2014). Schizophrenia: A scientific Delusion?. London: Routledge.

Willey, L. H. (2014). Pretending to be Normal: Living with Asperger's Syndrome (Autism Spectrum Disorder) Expanded Edition. New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Design Thinking

Design Thinking
It is not surprising that human thinking can be directed into numerous ways for different mind outcomes. Therefore, design thinking can easily be distinguished from scientific thinking, though there is a strong link between the two.  While scientific thinking results in a discovery of a fundamental knowledge, design thinking conceives the reality of experience. Considering this, design thinking draws from scientific thinking to achieve its outcomes (Brown, 2014). For instance, design thinking is highly dependent on reliability in pursuit of preferred desirable, useful, and possible future.
The design thinking concept, while attracting attention, is controversial. Experts disagree on its inclusiveness and how it works. However, there is an increasing evidence of importance and effectiveness of the subject (Bjogvinsson et al., 2012). Considerably, most learning institutions offer specific courses on the subject to help nurture future business leaders for innovation and creativity. The literature for such courses entails the operations of successful designers and their relationships with the business clients and other business stakeholders.  Resultantly, a recognition of its importance is growing especially in business, arts, and design as observed among the policy professionals for increased understanding.
Hebert Simons (a Nobel laureate) observed that design thinking is about the alteration of an existing situation as preferred by the business entity. He regarded designing as the transformation of the process to what it ought to be from what it is (Razzouk, 2013). In fact, it is a purposeful and conscious channeling of a business leader’s mental resources towards transformative and cultural production process for value addition. Essentially, design thinking not only weighs the perceived situational differences but also, it offers guidance on the transformation of wants, needs, and desires into plans, policies, designs, and other intentional artifacts. Additionally, design thinking is critical in the evaluation process of artifacts as experienced or assimilated in culture.
Design Thinking as a Strategic Tool in Business Leadership
The modern business environment is ever-changing. It demands business leaders possess a distinct set of skills from those prior to internet boom and advancement of technology. Currently, the stakeholders are empowered by the enormous accessibility of information that has dramatically altered the business rules. Therefore, it is imperative for business leaders to be agile and flexible for easier adaption to the new business environment. Design thinking comes into full view as an inevitable response to the organizational needs (Meinel and Leifer, 2015). Most scholars argue that design thinking is a state of mind that can be acquired by any business leader for prosperity, innovation, and organizational development. It is an indispensable tool for business leaders because it eases the path towards innovation and creativity. Simply put, design thinking hits the spot where technology, business feasibility and the demands of business clients overlap.
THE REVOLUTION OF DESIGN
The existing business landscape demands business brands and organizational leaders to be customer- centric. Design thinking drives this revolution for a mutually beneficial outcome in the relations between the stakeholders and the business entity. If the primary focus of a business brand is the needs of the audience, the organizational leadership can navigate optimally through such a new business environment characterized by uncertainty and flux state. A takeover of revolution implies that customer capitalism will replace business capitalism to ensure the satisfaction of clients and quality production (Muller and Thoring, 2012). In the process, push strategies will transform to pull strategies, where the firm will incorporate customer input during the design process to meet the market needs.  Moreover, brands ought not to be fearful in empowering the stakeholders and business clients by letting them take over the decision-making process. DART (dialogue, access, reflexivity, and transparency is an encapsulating model for this approach by providing the necessary platform for conversation with the product consumers on ways to extend or modify the content. In this way, the business leaders draw on their contributions for continuity and improvement. Eventually, product authenticity and openness during the design process amount to design revolution.
THE PROCESS OF DESIGN THINKING
Fig 1: The Process of Design Thinking neomobile-blog.com
Once the leadership demonstrates full commitment to the design revolution, the organization can comfortably handle design thinking. There are four widely accepted rules of design thinking. The first one is a human rule which predominantly focuses on the social dimension of the aspect, given that it centers human beings on the entire design process. Secondly, ambiguity rule eliminates the need for preconceived ideas, the mechanisms of idea-stifling, or stereotypes. Rather, this rule welcomes wild ideas by creating an innovative environment through an atmosphere that lacks predefined boundaries. Thirdly, the re-design rule builds on the enhancement and improvement of the existing designs to minimize the research and design costs. Lastly, the tangibility rule stems from the creation of prototypes to streamline communication between the distinct specialized teams of product designers (Leavy, 2011).
Numerous models exist on step-by-step design thinking process, but nearly all of them share similar iterative and consumer-centric traits. IDEO, for instance, breaks down the entire design thinking process into five steps. First, the designer should have a clear understanding of the process through a thorough consideration of the client’s behavior and their motivations. Secondly, it is important for the business leader to observe the development through extensive research and gathering information from people in the market. In this way, he will interact with his service or product. Third, visualization brainstorms ideas for the perfection of the design framework. Fourth, designers must refine and evaluate their ideas by making prototypes during early stages of the process. The last step of the process entails the implementation of all the proposed ideas. While the IDEO process has sequential steps, it fails to emphasize the need to ask the right questions or reframing of the queries in line with prototypes and tests conducted. Still, it is interesting to observe feedback as part of the product improvement. Notably, iterative prototyping fine-tunes the proposed ideas to identify and arrest the matters arising while identifying the existing business opportunities to unite client’s feedback and designer’s creativity.
FRAMING DESIGN QUESTION
When engaging in design thinking, the designer should be concerned about framing the right query. However, this phase should not consume a sizeable amount of time. Of keen to note is that the question’s frame wields a greater influence in the process’ direction. Therefore, asking the right questions increases the changes of greater ideas to effectively solve the design issue (Scheer et al., 2012). The frame of the question drives the nature of answers and product outcome. Ironically, the design thinking can backfire if the organizational leadership establishes numerous boundaries in the initial phase to immediately narrow down on the ultimate choice.
USER-CENTRIC
An organization cannot maintain competitiveness market leadership unless it shifts to user-centric status from being brand-centric. In the modern era interactivity and peer-to-peer communications are fundamental especially in the business world. Thus, customer insights need to drive design thinking and ideas. Hence, firsthand experience, extensive market research, and ethnography are critical avenues of design exploration. Often, consumers stumble on multiple touch points and milestones that the organization’s brand can wield a resounding impact. It is important, therefore, for the business leaders to stroll in the stakeholders’ shoes to solve the raised questions. A feat such as this is within reach if the designer is open minded and can express willingness to abandon preconceived ideas that hamper innovation efforts. Necessarily, the organization should clearly understand the likes, dislikes, motivations, and interests of the customers. The richer the information base an organization possesses, the closer the firm is to understand the customer insight and to minimize the level of competition in the market. Embracing all the market needs and different kinds of information is fundamental for the determination of the source of consumer insight. An all-rounded view of the market demands allows the corporation to formulate the persona that incorporates all the traits of the consumer.
THE KNOWLEDGE FUNNEL AND ADDUCTIVE REASONING
The challenge of design thinking in an organization follows the path of innovativeness rather than traditional pathways to success. It has to be accompanied by abductive reasoning to sustain organizational leadership in an ever-changing business environment. In retrospect, abductive reasoning refers to a logical process of deriving sense out of a given phenomenon that does not adhere to an existent deduction or has not occurred for a long time enough for induction. Essentially, this form of business reasoning focuses on the discovery of the most likely solution to the design problem (Viswananthan and Linsey, 2015). Interestingly, the knowledge funnel model clearly indicates how to integrate abductive reasoning to the real-world design situations.
 There are three stages in this process. The first one is the mystery phase, where the designer must ask a specified question and conduct an extensive exploratory research to detect insights. Secondly, the heuristic phase is attained when the researcher has reasonably explained the phenomenon to fully account for a mystery. The last phase is Algorithm. At this stage, the business leader intends to standardize the heuristic outcome. Then, he converts the outcome into a formula usable in the provision of solutions for similar issues. Often, most organizations that reach the second phase are susceptible to stagnation because of overconfidence. If this is the case, they allow the rivaling firms to gain a foothold in the market through implementation of groundbreaking ideas (Dorst, 2011). Considerably, it is important for the leading firms to recognize the end point and to revert to the mystery stage for reinvention and to sustain their competitive edge.
COLLABORATIVE CULTURE
For design thinking to be successful in the long-run, the firm must adopt an inter-disciplinary action. The strategy will not only enable the organization to profit from the diversity of the expertise but also, it will unconsciously allow the company to gradually and successfully drift away from narrow-mindedness. Collaborating with different professionals (such as psychologists and engineers) during the design process sets an ideal state of mind to be openly receptive to new and constructive ideas (Leavy, 2011). As reasoning extends to deeper levels, the chance to acquire additional insightful ideas is enhanced. By the same token, useful traits such as transparency and authenticity must be embraced. Lastly, the leading organizations should regard collaboration as a necessary undertaking, especially in the modern dynamic business world where user-generated content is increasingly becoming an integral part of the design process.
Defining the Concept of Design Thinking
The design thinking methodology refers to a repetitive and proven protocol for solving problems in any profession or business setting to attain desired but extraordinary outcome. A design is largely dependent on the constraints because ideas must be refined selections ought to be executed with precision. Thus, the concept of design thinking describes a continuous reinvention of a process by employing creative and unique techniques that yield desired and guaranteed outcomes (Meinel and Leifer, 2015). For many organizations that employ design thinking, the results often exceed the initially intended expectations. It is because of this reasons that business entities that focus on survival and competitiveness find the concept dynamic and attractive. 
In summary, understanding design thinking allows the business leaders to realize the need for step-by-step design process rather than focusing entirely on the end result. Design thinking goes beyond sociological and psychological considerations. In the modern times, attention span drastically diminishes as people spend a significant amount of time in social platforms (Johansson-Skoldberg et al., 2013). Ultimately, the behavior of people is altered according to the latest trends and dynamics in the environment. Therefore, design, as a business discipline must be driven by design thinking to keep up the pace of change. Most importantly, the organization should focus on user-centric approaches to address the needs in the society and to maintain competitiveness.
Fig 2: Corporate innovation and Dynamics steveblank.com














Bibliography
Bjögvinsson, E., Ehn, P. and Hillgren, P.A., 2012. Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges. Design Issues,28(3), pp.101-116.
Brown, T., 2014. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), p.84.
Dorst, K., 2011. The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), pp.521-532.
JohanssonSköldberg, U., Woodilla, J. and Çetinkaya, M., 2013. Design Thinking: Past, Present, and Possible Futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), pp.121-146.
Leavy, B., 2011. Collaborative Innovation as the New Imperative-Design Thinking, Value Co-Creation and the Power of “Pull”. Strategy & Leadership,40(2), pp.25-34.
Meinel, C. and Leifer, L. eds., 2015. Design Thinking Research. London: Springer.
Müller, R.M. and Thoring, K., 2012. Design Thinking Vs. Lean Start-up: A Comparison of Two User-Driven Innovation Strategies. Leading Through Design, 151.
Razzouk, R. and Shute, V., 2013. What is Design Thinking and Why is it Important?. Review of Educational Research, pp.29.
Scheer, A., Noweski, C. and Meinel, C., 2012. Transforming Constructivist Learning into Action: Design Thinking in Education. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 17(3).

Viswanathan, V.K. and Linsey, J.S., 2015. Physical Models and Design Thinking: A Study of Functionality, Novelty, and Variety of Ideas. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134(9), pp.14.

Republican Planks

Republican Planks
For more than a century, the world regards America as a land of opportunity. However, the last 8 years of Democratic Party rule has yielded an economic downturn that threatens to dent the country’s reputation. Currently, America faces unprecedented challenges and uncertainties on the sluggish economy, the war in the Middle East, terrorism in the West, and fiscal policies. Hundreds of thousands of Americans in the midwest and the Southern states experience the burden of lost homes and jobs. In fact, studies indicate that many of them have lost hope on the future of the nation. Meanwhile, Obama’s administration continuously expands the scope and size of the federal government, its deficit and debt as well as the spending and borrowing. In fact, liberty retreats gradually as federalism is threatened. Therefore, the 2016 planks for the Republican platform should be centered on these issues to ensure that America regains and maintains its growth trajectory (Weinberg, 2011).
Specifically, the last four years have witnessed a significant loss of America’s global leadership role. Given that there is a direct link between global dominance and economic vitality, the next four years of American presidency should be defined by an honest talk on the challenges experienced and trustworthiness. With republican leadership, the United States will implement profound changes on taxation, budgetary system, and regulation of government operations. In essence, Americans will choose to retain of Obama’s policies or Republican’s optimistic and positive view of societal opportunities for the attainment of American dream and prosperity.
1.      Sound Monetary Policies
The massive nature of the federal government has rendered it financially and structurally broken. Years of Democratic rule has pushed it beyond the fundamental functions, thus resulting in increased spending to levels that cannot be sustained by a weak economy. Commonly, elected federal officials overpromise and overspend. Unless a dramatic action is taken during the November elections, the future generations of Americans will inherit high and unsustainable debt. The interest rates for such debt will likely consume a significant portion of national wealth. Most European countries like Greece and Iceland currently face national bankruptcies. A similar fate is likely to be experienced in the United States if a Republican leadership is not installed. In the last three years alone, the existing administration had added more than 5 trillion to the national debt, despite cutting the defense budget. Resultantly, the national debt is more than 15 trillion, the highest in the country’s history. In the year 2011, the government spending crossed 3.5 trillion-mark (a quarter of the overall GDP). It implies that the government borrowed half of the spent money. Federal statistics indicate that Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security constitute approximately 40% of the annual federal spending (Platform, 2012). Evidently, these skyrocketing levels of spending yield debt that stagnate the economy while lowering the rate of job creation. Even worse, the latest projections of future spending are socially and economically catastrophic (King et al., 2013). Obamacare alone will lead to over-taxation, and higher commodity price tags.
With the help of Republican Congressmen and members of the House, the future Republican president is mandated to propose immediate slash of federal spending for manageable fiscal control. A tripartite test for all the federal activities is suggestible. For instance, the Republicans and other House members will explore if a federal activity falls within the constitutional scope, its effectiveness, and necessity. Additionally, the president will determine if the federal activities justify foreign borrowing for funding.
2.      The Budget
It is not enough for the government to cut spending. Some other recommendations include structural reforms, application of technology, and downsizing of the government to limit deficits and debt for better economic growth (Goldsmith, 2013). For instance, if the health care is reformed, thousands of senior citizens will be empowered to control individual healthcare decision. The move will sharply contrast Obamacare, where only a few bureaucrats are empowered while the deserved care for the elderly is denied.
Altering the budgeting process to reflect economic and time changes is imperative. Since the Democrats took over the leadership in 2008, the budget process design has not restrained reckless spending. Rather, it has enabled unnecessary expenditures by according the Congressmen with procedural cover. In fact, tax expenditures have enabled the taxpayers to keep government earnings through exemptions, credits, and deductions, which is equivalent to incurring expenses on other entitlement programs. Interestingly, the welfare checks and benefits of veterans are not included in the list of entitlements. Besides, this process wrongly assumes that the tax cuts are temporary while government spending is permanent. It does not acknowledge the important budgetary impact of lowered rates of taxes. If a spending increase is lower than the inflation rate, the existing administration regards spending as a cut.
Republican Congressmen have made numerous attempts to introduce reforms on the current budget process for accountability and transparency. Particularly, they unanimously voted for a Balanced Budgetary Amendment to instigate for constitutional restraints similar to those applicable in 33 US states. If a republican president wins the next election, he will lead the party in an amendment of the constitution to discourage tax increase unless there is war or national emergencies. In addition, the next administration shall impose a cap to limit spending to historical levels. In this way, the national budget will be balanced to spur economic growth.
3.      Workplace Freedom
The Obama Administration clings to power concentration in the offices of elite union leaders in Washington. Therefore, the needs of employees are hardly represented on the ground. The administration supports anti-business card legislation that denies the workforce a secret ballot to elect union leaders. Consequently, the use of Project Labor Agreements prevents more than 80 percent of the construction employees from seeking employment opportunities in stimulus projects. Additionally, the Democrats have transformed NLRB (National Labor Relations Board) into a labor advocacy that threatens and coerce business entities through controversial laws, micro-unions, and frequent snap elections.
Considering this, a Republican Administration will restore the rule of law through a re-enactment of Secret Ballot Protection Act to block card checks. Furthermore, the administration shall discourage labor violence through enforcement of Hobbs Act. Raise Act will be passed to allow hardworking employees to receive a pay rise without the need for workers union endorsement. Moreover, republicans shall repeal Davis-Bacon Act to effectively end PLA (Project Labor Agreements). Essentially, this will save trillions of dollars of taxpayers’ money spent on artificial federal projects.
In summary, the next Republican president should focus on issues surrounding the American economy and job creation. Notably, the American economy is yet to regain the rate of growth experienced prior to the 2008 recession. Unless the economy is jumpstarted through a sound monetary policy, most of the industries will be relocated to other Asian countries such as China and India.
References
Goldsmith, S. B. (2013). Political Party Platform Health Planks: A Mechanism For Participation And Prediction?. American journal of public health, 63(7), 594-601.
King, G., Laver, M., Hofferbert, R. I., Budge, I., & McDonald, M. D. (2013). Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending. American Political Science Review, 87(03), 744-750.
The platform, R. (2012). We believe in America. In Republican National Convention.

Weinberg, M. W. (2011). Writing the Republican Platform. Political Science Quarterly, 92(4), 655-662.

Teamwork

Teamwork
Question 1: A Self- Managed Team
A self-managed team is an important approach to improving the overall performance in the class. In this type of teamwork, the members have a collective responsibility for effective operation to meet the target. A self-managed team is unnecessary in a college setting because each member should have an understanding and a broader framework of the objectives and aims to attain a common goal.
Benefits
            Self-managed teams ensure effective decision making because of the collaboration among the team members. Additionally, they increase the students’ productivity level because the learners have full responsibility of their actions. Further, the level of commitment and motivation is heightened as increased autonomy allows students to become more involved in the discussion of coursework.
Drawbacks
            Setting up self-managed groups is difficult. Besides, there is no culture of its application in a learning environment. The team members should also be taught how self-managed teams work, hence requiring time and use of resources. Lastly, there is a need for preparation, constant communication, follow-up, and planning by the teachers for successful student transition.
Number of Members
Self-managed teams should be composed of 10 to 15 members. The number is appropriate for resuming the former supervisor’s responsibilities, given that each member should be specialized in a specific area of expertise such as the working pace, determination of job assignments, and the inspection procedures.
I would like to be a part of a self-managed team because it will present me with an opportunity to practice my leadership skills. Additionally, a self-managed team is autonomous, thus, the responsibility will accord me with the freedom to explore my areas of strength and to discover my weaknesses.
Question 2: Methods of Compensation
A fee-for-service is recommendable for physicians to ensure that the doctors work harder to provide quality healthcare to the patients. In this way, they become financially motivated to execute their tasks. For a computer sales person, both fixed and variable compensation elements are appropriate. Therefore, they should be entitled to salaries and commission for positive motivation, unlike a software developer that ought to receive higher but fixed salary. Teachers should be compensated through salaries, though the exact amount should be variable as per the level of expertise and seniority (Nickel et al. 309). The remuneration for airline pilots should be salary. Regular monthly income is appropriate for pilots because their profession entails regular tasks, mostly to fixed destinations. Lastly, the assembly line workers should be compensated according to service delivery because of professional technicality and the need for motivation.
Question 3: Fair Pay
Fair pay refers to income that allows the workers to elevate and maintain their living standards at or beyond the poverty line. Organizations have both legal and moral obligation to provide additional benefits to the workers. For instance in the United States, organizations are not considered to maintain a fair pay structure if their employees receive less than thrice the national minimum wage. Therefore, a fair pay cannot be met unless the organization considers additional benefits to employees beyond the minimum wage.
Healthcare benefits should be mandatory because a failure of the organization to cover 100% of the healthcare costs implies that it must pay for the coverage without deduction from the employee’s salary. It is unethical for an organization to tout healthcare insurance as a fringe benefit. Besides, studies show that firms with proper fridge benefits have low preventable costs as compared to those with poor fringe benefits (Nickel et al. 314).
A fair system for both employers and employees should involve lengthy discussion between both parties for a win-win situation. Employers should engage with the representatives of the workers to determine appropriate compensation and to avoid future conflicts and dissatisfaction. Hardworking employees should be properly remunerated as well.





Work Cited

Nickel, William G., J. M. McHugh, and S. M. McHugh. "Understanding Business." (2015): 300-320. Print. 

Kadlec V. Lakeview Anesthesia Associates and Lakeview Medical Center

Kadlec V. Lakeview Anesthesia Associates and Lakeview Medical Center
As a plaintiff, Kadlec Medical Center sued Dr. Berry Robert (the defendant), a major shareholder and anesthesiologist at Lakeview Medical Center and LAA (Louisiana Anesthesia Associates). The lawsuit was based on his use of narcotics on-duty, thus nearly causing the patient’s death. According to the plaintiff, Lakeview and LAA’s referral letters were misleading because they failed to disclose Dr. Berry’s addiction to narcotic and past history marred by negligence (Sanford 384).
Despite his use of narcotics, Dr. Berry applied to work for Kadlec Medical. In his application letter, he included referrals from the former workmates at LAA. The referrals were reviewed by the hiring committee at Kadlec Medical as a formal process of credentialing. In both letters, his workmates did not mention that the doctor was fired less than two months because he put the patient’s lives at risk. Instead, they showered praises on Dr. Berry’s competence and professionalism. In addition, Lakeview received questionnaires from Kadlec on behavioral problems and disciplinary actions. However, out of 14 questionnaires on the information about the firm’s workforce, only Dr. Berry’s was neither completed nor returned. While treating Jones, the doctor did not follow the procedure. Therefore, he failed to resuscitate the patient, resulting in a permanent vegetative state. Thereafter, Kadlec paid $8 million in settlement of the case and sued Lakeview for negligent and intentional misrepresentation of their former employee as indicated in the referrals.
Issues
There were four issues highlighted in the lawsuit. The first one was if the defendants were morally obligated not to conduct affirmative misrepresentations in the referrals on Dr. Berry. Second was if the shareholders’ statements were misleading materially. The third issue concerned the hospital referral letter and if it was misleading. Lastly, the court sought to determine whether the defendants were mandated to disclose sensitive personal information in their referral letters.
Rule
The holdings in the first and second issues were ‘yes’ while in the third and fourth, they were ‘no’. The court ruled that Dr. Berry’s former employer is liable for misleading information in the referrals that did not fully disclose Dr. Berry’s addiction to narcotics and his past negligence.
Argument
In the ruling, the court argued that it is legal for a party to keep total silence so as not to violate any rule of law. However, volunteering to provide information to influence the conduct of a second party binds him to disclose the whole information and truth. The argument applied to the doctors who chose to author the referral letters (Sanford 383). Secondly, the former work mates’ statements misled the plaintiff because they indicated Dr. Berry’s excellence in his profession and that he was highly recommendable. Thus, they were false and materially misleading. Thirdly, Lakeview’s letter did not mislead the organization because it neither recommended the doctor nor indicated his proficiency as a physician. Lastly, the court strongly rejected the public policy argument due to concerns on claims of defamation and the need for employee’s privacy.
In summary, the jury ruled in favor of the plaintiff given the circumstances surrounding the affirmative misrepresentations, misleading statements, and affirmative duty to full disclosure of employee’s private information (Sanford 383). As a result, the plaintiff was awarded $8.2 million. Since this case, the law has been amended to accommodate arrest cases of partial disclosure of a party’s information for malicious reasons. Currently, the American courts refer to this ruling in similar cases.














Works Cited

Sanford, Sallie Thieme. "Candor After Kadlec: Why, Despite the Fifth Circuit's Decision, Hospitals Should Anticipate an Expanded Obligation to Disclose Risky Physician Behavior." Drexel Law Review 1 (2009): 383-385.

The Interplay between Markets and Government in Today’s Economy

1.                   The Interplay between Markets and Government in Today’s Economy
In a modern economic system, the aggregate interactions between the business and citizens guide economic decisions and pricing of services and goods. In the developed world, for instance, there is a little intervention from the government (central planning). Contrastingly, there are centrally planned economies such as North Korea, China, and Russia, where the state institutions are heavily involved in monitoring the decisions made to improve the economic performance. 
Mainly, price coordinates economic decisions in a market as demand and supply interact. Therefore, economies based on market conditions are also referred to as free economies because socio-economic institutions alter the pricing to affect to solve the problems that affect the economy (Moomaw et al., 2013). Additionally, an invisible hand affects a market economy because sellers and buyers are responsive to the pricing system, hence the coordination of the two parties.
Private Sector Entrepreneurship
In the modern times, private sector entrepreneurs make decisions to solve economic problems. Most of the time, they aim at profiting from the business and sale and purchase of market commodities. Therefore, they factor commodity prices when making decisions. On the other hand, consumers are responsible for creating market demand by revealing their preferred commodities through a purchase process. Additionally, suppliers consider commodity cost and profitability when creating a supply force. Consequently, they allocate adequate resources to inject more commodities into the market for maximum income and profitability.
The production issue concerns the selection of appropriate production technique by considering the economic conditions in the market. Given that the private sector aims at maximization of profit, the entrepreneurs select the most cost-effective method of production. Therefore, a low-price factor is more applicable in the production process to lower the production cost. Another problem arises from the distribution of the economy’s total output to the country’s citizens. In countries such as the United States, people are not limited to a number of resources they can own. Factors such as skills, merits, entrepreneurship, and inheritance decide the resource ownership. However, the owner is at liberty to redistribute his property through charitable organizations and donations.
The State
In planned economies, a central authority decides resource issues on resource allocation through councils controlled by the state.  Proper planning is imperative in centralized economies to ensure an attainment of the desired outcome. For instance, in Cuba, the government solves basic economic issues by using a preset plan to allocate resources. A plan such as this is a descriptive statement that illustrates the income distribution, market conditions, the state resources and the production process. Mostly, a central regulatory organ decides the allocation of resources between the investment goods and the consumer.
The modern financial markets are characterized by turbulence and volatility due to economic instability and financial crisis. In the past, economies employed traditional institutions to solve economic issues in the market. Prehistoric techniques and instruments were used in the past. For example, production responded to the people’s demands. The farmers produced food and grazed domestic animals for subsistence use by individuals within a given region. Therefore, people exchanged commodities to sustain the local economy. An economic model such as this still exists in some of the most remote parts of Asia and Africa. In comparison, the modern free market economy is characterized by limited interference from regulatory institutions such as the Federal Reserve.
Capitalism
            Capitalism is an economic institution that characterizes the markets in the western world, especially the UK and the United States. The US maintain a liberal economy with less state intervention. However, economic problems are mitigated through tax imposition. Instead, the state organs provide services such as law enforcement, pollution control, and education to boost the economic prospects. At times, the government in a capitalist economy can pass policies and legislature to regulate the market conditions. Therefore, a state intervention in a capitalist economy cannot be ruled out.  In Europe, capitalism replaced feudalism which was a dominant institution in the medieval times. It was a political, economic, and social system based on a manor or a lord’s estate. A lord’s manor included churches, peasant villages, mills, farmlands, and the manor house. During the medieval times, the self-sufficiency of the manors allowed for the occurrence of economic activities.  Thus, no trade occurred during such a period.
Corporatism
            Corporatism involves the export-oriented manufacturing as is the case with the German economy. Basically, corporatism involves the organization of the economy and the society into distinct interest groups and their representatives to solve economic problems through joint agreements and negotiations. Corporatism is a strategy to raise the level of industrial output while employing a solid nationalist approach. It is a system that that emphasize the positive role of the government especially with regards to offering a guarantee on the social justice. At the same time, corporatism suppresses the social and moral chaos of the population that pursues self-interests. The system is flexible because it allows the state to implement economic policies without sharp oppositions from the people.
2.                   Unique Problems
            The main economic problem that the market attempts to solve is the scarcity of resources needed to satisfy people’s needs, especially when there is an insufficient knowledge, energy, and will to meet the wishes of all individuals in a given society. It is true that there is a cost to be incurred when acquiring or producing economic commodities demanded in the market. Therefore, it is imperative to determine the sense of belonging of the products.
Surpluses and Shortages
            In market economies, government intervention creates social security problems that can neither be solved by private enterprises nor the state. In a market economy, private enterprises do not offer a person an opportunity to plan for a retirement. Equally, the intervening state allows the individual a limited chance only after tax remittance. With regards to social security, the state establishes a price ceiling to people above the age of 65. Terms such as these bar private enterprises from performing their duty.
            Another way that the government creates problematic surpluses and shortages in a market economy is through price fixations. If the price of commodities is set lower than determined by the market, the result is an immediate surplus of consumers as the willing suppliers become scarce.  Notably, people are mostly interested in commodities at the lowest price possible. Contrastingly, if a price is set higher than the market price, the number of suppliers will rise sharply while that of buyers drops drastically.  Considering this, the problem of social security refers to the surplus of retired individuals with hopes of livelihood provision in the future.
The Farm Problem
            Since the dawn of the industrial revolution, the farm problem affects the market as it strives to balance the economy for prosperity. At the time, the businessmen attracted personal savings for investment in machines, tools, and factories to encourage job creation. As trade and business specialization develop in any given economy, it is mandatory for a section of the population to produce fiber and food. However, the agricultural industry has been depressed by people shifting to industrialized and urbanized markets. Essentially, this is the manner of a competitive market where scarce resources and workers are drawn to attractive opportunities of employment from less attractive economic conditions.
Reactions and Actions
            In free market economies such as the United States, the voting blocs of non-workers that demand equal rights are expanding steadily. Additionally, the state officials (especially those unaware of the need to defend private property) impose heavy taxes on workers and savers to provide the needs of the non-workers. Meanwhile, the government urges businessmen collaborate in the development of employment training courses despite the lack of profitability prospect. Hence, it is impossible for a free market to solve the issue of a surplus of subsidized non-workers. As an example, private enterprises in a free market cannot implement new housing projects in as much as the government criticizes the existent structures. Thus, the demand for housing is boosted by abatement, zoning restrictions, rent controls and tax exemptions.
3.      Market Solving All the Problems in the United States
      The market cannot completely solve the market problems.
            Research indicates that effective markets are only useful in coordinating the interactions and transactions in business entities with sufficient information on the value of service or product in the market. Additionally, it is impossible for markets to solve inherent problems in an expansive modern country like the United States. Markets cannot broadcast adequate information to all the concerned parties as well as t all the participation levels within the large scale trade webs. Unlike markets, people have an ability to decide on the exact time to make exchanges or to consider product value. Moreover, a market is a mere mechanism that facilitates exchange. Therefore, it only works if the involved parties are aware of the basics of the production process of goods and services. The American economy is remarkably diverse. In fact, the free market economy is overwhelmed with technical expertise embedded within the process of production.  Moreover, the US economy is so distributed in time and space that the participants cannot have enough knowledge on the underlying value forming the basis of product pricing.
            The situation is further complicated as the modern American market has multiple competing parties. According to hierarchical control theory, an absence of a logistical level of competition jeopardizes the equitable resource distribution and wealth in an economy. Most economic experts in the US argue that competition is responsible for the low cost of operation and higher innovation in the production. However, such a mechanism is dependent on fairness and absolute honesty to overcome the temptations that violate protocols. Notoriously, American citizens are susceptible to this temptation as seen in years prior to the economic recession. At the moment, numerous legislations are enacted by government agencies to provide a band-aid approach to logistics. During the leadership of Clinton and Reagan, use of deregulations unearthed weaknesses of markets with regards to cheating. Therefore, without the use of traditional measures, modern US market cannot sustain an equitable distribution behavior especially if the Congress is a sole decision-making body.
            The global markets have failed investors blatantly since the 2008 economic recession. Most analysts observe that an over-reliance of the free market as a transaction mediator can lead to enormous market failures especially in financial derivatives, securities, and housing. For instance, the housing bubble is prompted by the sellers’ inability to value the property realistically, properly, and prudently. Resultantly, a herd mentality takes over, convincing all the parties that the cost of houses will always maintain a steady rise over time. In the long run, people consider their houses as financial investments guaranteed to appreciate in value despite economic conditions. The housing appreciation, therefore, is used as collateral for loans to purchase other products or services. In the wake of financial crisis, the purported rise in housing prices overshadowed the economic performance as the analysts included the unrealistic costs in calculating the country’s GDP. In essence, it painted a wrong picture on the health of America’s economy. Because homes constantly gained value, the GDP rose steadily, thus failing as an important determinant of the economic conditions.
            In a classic case such as this, the market failure is clearly evident. Particularly, the market failed in mortgage-backed security products and other mortgage derivatives. Despite this, numerous libertarian and conservative voices call for the freedom of the market rather than a reconsideration of traditional economic measures to protect the fragile American market. They argue that the market was never fully freed as demonstrated by the frequent failures that threaten to cripple the growth process (Heilbroner & Milberg, 2012). The libertarian voices claim that if the market was indeed free, it will be possible to solve all the US’s economic problems. A section of economists shrugs off the proposition of more government regulations as fallacious. Most importantly, the necessity of incorporation of traditional measures to curb the market conditions cannot be understated.
            To understand the reason for market failure, the evolution of America’s economy from the early exchange modes between the Indian tribes to the modern market. People improved several moral thinking patterns to ensure proper trading. The mental patterns ensured fairness in trading by balancing the resources placed by others with trader’s efforts. The regulators of early markets often arrested malicious attempts to claim extra value than warranted. Consequently, the violator was subjected to tough sanctions as a punishment. Tracking changes in the traditional measures and dynamics results in an understanding of the limitations of the market mechanisms. In this way, the regulators can understand the causes of failure in the housing industry.
            The market fails when it cannot guarantee the fairness and equitability of trade for all the parties involved. In the case of the housing bubble, Libertarians often argue that market system worked because the prices stabilized after the bubble burst. However, thousands of families in America today are yet to overcome economic challenges as their homes are lost due to foreclosures. They bought the houses when the market was riding high but after the slump, the financial institutions forced them to repay loans at higher prices despite the tumbling investments. When the majority of these individuals lost their jobs, they lacked an alternative other than to admit a total loss and to speculate on future market situations. Desperations such as these are a testament to the failures of the market and the need to maintain the tradition and command economic solutions.
            The current US market governance systems (such as Federal Reserve, EPA, and Federal Trade Commission) aim at incorporating tradition and command to restore the economy and to provide logistical control. However, there is uncertainty on how to regulate the market because these agencies resulted from the state’s reaction to frequent economic failures and market weaknesses. An overarching theory for the existence of these agencies is lacking, hence the failures of the existing regulatory approaches to the market system (Heilbroener & Milberg, 2012). The American government does not apply the understanding of natural hierarchical control to formulate and operate functional mechanisms for coordination of the market economy. Mostly, the regulatory organs attempt to implement inappropriate band-aid measures.
            Specifically, markets are useful in providing solutions for local issues affecting trade. They hardly fail when applied properly to the local economic conditions. Still, it is worth noting that they cannot eradicate all the economic issues unless other traditional measures are included in sourcing for a lasting remedy. The Americans assumed that market eliminates all the problems, but now, emulation of American strategy by the global economies has proved disastrous. Instead, the economies that mix command, tradition, and markets such as China and India are successful especially in ensuring equitability in wealth distribution. The fact that such economies are not purely capitalistic demonstrates their inability to grasp the environmental issues, though they are neither planned economic systems. Policy makers must have a clear understanding of autopoiesis to ensure achievement of a fair economic model that is beneficial to all the Americans despite their social background.





References
Heilbroner, R. L., & Milberg, W. S. (2012). The Making of Economic Society. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

Moomaw, R., Olson, K., McLean, W., & Applegate, M. (2013). Economics and contemporary issues. Cengage Learning.